Drugs and the Meaning of Life - Sam Harris

I was directed to a great article this morning: it’s both intelligent and lucid, and especially near the end, hints at some really cool ideas that the author—the renowned neuroscientist Sam Harris—will apparently be addressing in his future writing.

In the spirit of my generation, I’ve cut it up into a few mangled and context-less pieces for you to glance at, having bolded what struck me as particularly cool.

Be sure to read the whole thing if it suits your fancy:

The problem is that we refer to all biologically active compounds by a single term—“drugs”—and this makes it nearly impossible to have an intelligent discussion about the psychological, medical, ethical, and legal issues surrounding their use.

The “war on drugs” has been well lost, and should never have been waged. While it isn’t explicitly protected by the U.S. Constitution, I can think of no political right more fundamental than the right to peacefully steward the contents of one’s own consciousness. The fact that we pointlessly ruin the lives of nonviolent drug users by incarcerating them, at enormous expense, constitutes one of the great moral failures of our time.

But if [my daughter] does not try a psychedelic like psilocybin or LSD at least once in her adult life, I will worry that she may have missed one of the most important rites of passage a human being can experience.

As a general matter, I believe we should be very slow to make conclusions about the nature of the cosmos based upon inner experience — no matter how profound these experiences seem.

Many people wonder about the difference between meditation (and other contemplative practices) and psychedelics. Are these drugs a form of cheating, or are they the one, indispensable vehicle for authentic awakening? They are neither. Many people don’t realize that all psychoactive drugs modulate the existing neurochemistry of the brain—either by mimicking specific neurotransmitters or by causing the neurotransmitters themselves to be more active. There is nothing that one can experience on a drug that is not, at some level, an expression of the brain’s potential.

I have visited both extremes on the psychedelic continuum. The positive experiences were more sublime than I could have ever imagined or than I can now faithfully recall. These chemicals disclose layers of beauty that art is powerless to capture and for which the beauty of Nature herself is a mere simulacrum. It is one thing to be awestruck by the sight of a giant redwood and to be amazed at the details of its history and underlying biology. It is quite another to spend an apparent eternity in egoless communion with it. Positive psychedelic experiences often reveal how wondrously at ease in the universe a human being can be—and for most of us, normal waking consciousness does not offer so much as a glimmer of these deeper possibilities.

But as the peaks are high, the valleys are deep. My “bad trips” were, without question, the most harrowing hours I have ever suffered—and they make the notion of hell, as a metaphor if not a destination, seem perfectly apt.

As I discussed in The End of Faith, I view most psychedelic experiences as potentially misleading. Psychedelics do not guarantee wisdom. They merely guarantee more content. And visionary experiences, considered in their totality, appear to me to be ethically neutral.

As I will discuss in future essays, the form of transcendence that appears to link directly to ethical behavior and human well-being is the transcendence of egoity in the midst of ordinary waking consciousness. It is by ceasing to cling to the contents of consciousness—to our thoughts, moods, desires, etc.—that we make progress. Such a project does not, in principle, require that we experience more contents.  The freedom from self that is both the goal and foundation of “spiritual” life is coincident with normal perception and cognition—though, admittedly, this can be difficult to realize.

The power of psychedelics, however, is that they often reveal, in the span of a few hours, depths of awe and understanding that can otherwise elude us for a lifetime.

(Source: ikevan)

I saw Toy Story 3 tonight. It was fantastic: an imaginative, entertaining, and emotional rollercoaster of laughs, goose-bumps, action sequences and nostalgia—today’s cinema, par excellence.

But I’m entirely more interested in talking about the short film that precedes it—no, not that laser-driven attempt at restoring Max’s wicked old intro speech—I mean Day & Night, certainly the best commercially-produced short I’ve ever seen.

Pixar seems to have done well to keep it a secret until tonight, however, and there isn’t much copy material available just yet, so I’ve only posted the very short clip above to give you a feel for what I’m about to talk about. And here’s why I think it’s such a landmark piece:

First off, it’s ‘filmic’ in a way I’ve never seen before. Though I’ve been quietly working on a film that tells its story through the shape/edges of the screen itself, what Pixar has done with their 3D CGI-world(s) nested within a 2D cell animation is absolutely genius. It melds multiple layers of story/visuals/contexts/relationships into a single whole, thereby lending to the film a significant amount of both physical and figurative depth. In fact, this is one of my leading interests within the film world right now, and I’ve even recently written a paper about what I call implicate depth (following David Bohm). The major film project I’m working on this summer aims to have a lot of this in it, too.

Second—beyond its technical merits—the story and concepts that underlie Day & Night are right up my alley… so much so that I’ve removed pieces of my blog bio so as not to look like I plain stole the ideas from this film. But mystery truly is the beauty in life, and the unknown is not to be feared, it is to be reveled in until new knowledge can take its place, until new connections can be forged. Day & Night makes this point simply, powerfully, beautifully.

I can’t wait to watch it again.